A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.
The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as " (7) ", got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of "reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been "involved in a terrorism-related activity". He would also have to be (10) that such an order was "strictly required". The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had " (11) grounds" for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12)
The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.
But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.

A:if only B:only if C:only that D:only not

A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.
The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as " (7) ", got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of "reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been "involved in a terrorism-related activity". He would also have to be (10) that such an order was "strictly required". The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had " (11) grounds" for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12)
The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.
But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.

A:if only B:only if C:only that D:only not

Section Ⅰ Use of English Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that. The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as " (7) ", got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of "reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been "involved in a terrorism-related activity". He would also have to be (10) that such an order was "strictly required". The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had " (11) grounds" for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention. But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.

A:if only B:only if C:only that D:only not

Mr. Wang is the (only one) of the teachers (in) our university (who) (own) a car.（　）

A:only one B:in C:who D:own

(Only) by practice (will you) be able to improve your (speaking) English and gradually (speak) fluently.（）

A:Only B:will you C:speaking D:speak

A (knowledge) of several languages is essential to the study of comparative literature because (without them) one can read (only) (in) translation.

A:knowledge B:without them C:only D:in

Which of the following conditions will make a relation that is in first normal form to be in second normal form　　Ⅰ. every non-key attribute is functionally dependent on the full set of primary key attributes.　　Ⅱ. no non-key attributes exist in the relation.　　Ⅲ. the primary key consists of only one attribute.

A:Ⅰ only B:Ⅰ and Ⅱ only C:Ⅰ and Ⅲ only D:any of them

New rules and behavior standards for middle school students came out in March. A middle school is going to start new rules (1) who the top students are. The best students will (2) have high marks, they will also be ones who don’t color their hair, smoke or drink. The following are more of the new rules:Tell the truth. Have you ever copied (3) work in an exam Don’t do it again! That’s not something (4) students should do. If you are playing computer games in your room, don’t tell your parents you are doing homework.Do more activities at school. Good students love animals and (5) others. April is Bird-Loving Month in China. Is your school doing anything to celebrate it You should join ! That way you can learn more about animals and (6) them. When more people work together, it brings us more (7) .Learn to co-operate. When your basketball team is (8) , only working together can make your team (9) Be friendly to the people you are with. Try to think of others, not only yourself.Be open to new ideas. Have you ever thought that people could live on the moon Maybe you’ll (10) Earth II someday. Don’t look down upon new ideas. All the ideas are important. You should welcome them, because new ideas make life better for everyone.Pay attention to your safety. You should not walk (11) outside, especially at night. (12) where the public phones are. If (13) happens, you can find them quickly. If you take a bus to a place far away, please don’t sleep. This prevents a stranger (14) money from you.Use the Internet carefully. The Internet can be very useful for your studies. (15) not everything on the Internet is fit for kids. You may enter healthy websites for your homework or just for fun.

A:neither B:both C:not only D:only