It is clear that some chemicals can damage the health of animals and humans. (1) , this is not the only problem that (2) be caused by the careless use of chemicals. Chemicals can also (3) the ecological balance of the environment. If the ecological balance is disturbed, the results can be (4) serious.The (5) of DDT illustrates the problem. DDT, a chemical which kills insects, at first seemed to be a perfect answer (6) many problems. It would control insects that caused dangerous diseases, (7) insects that caused billions of dollars of damage to crops every year. Governments permitted and even (8) the use of DDT. Farmers in many countries (9) to spray it on their crops. The (10) results were good. Damage to crops (11) down, and profits went up. However, the chemical had effects which the scientists didn’t see in (12) . First, it also killed insects which were the (13) enemies of the harmful insects and which were therefore beneficial to farmers. Second, and perhaps worse, DDT did not kill (14) harmful insect. A few insects had natural resistance to the chemical. They (15) and reproduced in large numbers. In a few years there were large numbers of insects which were not (16) by DDT, and there were (17) insects which Could act as natural (18) on these new "super-insects". Finally, it became clear that DDT was not solving the insect problem. In fact, it was making the problem worse. It (19) became necessary to find a second (20) for the effects of the first.
第(16)空应选择()A:effected B:affected C:damaged D:killed
Passage One
There was a nasty (肮脏的,卑鄙的) accident in our town not long ago, and I saw it happen. I was standing near a road which was under repair, not doing anything special—just watching the men at work. It was not far from the new motorway (高速公路) that runs past the town. It was an old road that used to be very busy—and dangerous before the motorway was built. Today, most cars use the new "superhighway" and the old road is pretty quiet, although cars do often come off the motorway into the town faster than they should.
Anyway, the men were repairing part of the road and there were signs up for at least 200 meters, telling everybody that the road was narrower than usual. Most of the drivers in both directions saw the signs and slowed down.
Then three cars came along close together, the third one moving at a very high speed. The first one pas sed the workmen and wanted to turn left. Meanwhile the third car came flying past the second one. The sec and car stopped. I think the driver knew something was going to happen. It did. The third car had no chance of stopping. Its driver braked (刹车) and pulled over to miss the first car and went right off the road.
There were four people in that car: a man, two women and a child. The child was a boy of nine. I read later that they were going shopping—just shopping, nothing more important than that. The driver was badly hurt. The little bay was hurt too. Both the women were killed immediately. One of them was the driver’s wife and the other was the mother of the little boy. They never got to the shops.
A:drove very, very fast B:killed another driver C:killed himself D:both A and C
"Ten people are said to have been killed in the accident” could be rewritten as()
A:It is said that ten people are killed in the accident. B:It was said that ten people were killed in the accident. C:It was said that ten people had been killed in the accident. D:It is said that ten people were killed in the accident.
A:killed B:has killed C:had killed D:has been killing
A:killed B:has killed C:had killed D:has been killing
? ?阅读下面的短文,文中有15处空白,每处空白给出了4个选项,请根据短文的内容从4个选项中选择1个最佳答案。
{{B}}? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?The Discovery of Penicillin (青霉素){{/B}} ? ?In the autumn of 1928, a Scottish scientist Alexander Fleming was searching for a substance that would kill fatal germs(细菌). On his desk were small plates containing the germs. {{U}}?(51) ?{{/U}} evening, he forgot to cover one of the plates. When he arrived the next morning, he found a spot of green mould(霉菌)in one plate. This is not strange because the room was rather damp(潮湿) ,with {{U}}?(52) ?{{/U}} one window. But Fleming did not throw out the spoiled plate, be cause something unusual caught {{U}}?(53) ?{{/U}} attention. ? ?On the uncovered plate, near the green mould, the germs {{U}}?(54) ?{{/U}}. That meant that the mould had killed the germs there. Fleming watched the mould grow {{U}}?(55) ?{{/U}} several days. As the green mould spread, it killed more and {{U}}?(56) ?{{/U}} germs. ? ?Fleming began to study the mysterious mould. It grew and grew. Then he noticed tiny drops of liquid on the surface of the mould. Perhaps this was the chemical that was destroying the germs. ? ?Fleming drew off the liquid, drop by drop. He put this liquid in a test tube, and it {{U}}?(57) ?{{/U}} the germs in the tube. He called the {{U}}?(58) ?{{/U}} penicillin. ? ?Fleming published his finding in a British medical journal {{U}}?(59) ?{{/U}} 1929. But for ten years, while he continued to experiment with penicillin, his discovery was largely ignored near the medical world. ? ?Then in 1938 a team of British scientists happened to {{U}}?(60) ?{{/U}} about Fleming’s findings in an old medical journal. They made further {{U}}?(61) ?{{/U}} with the drug. They tested it on animals and then {{U}}?(62) ?{{/U}} human beings. In 1941, it was declared safe for use on humans. Soon penicillin was produced in large quantity and was used to {{U}}?(63) ?{{/U}} many infections(感染). ? ?Penicillin is a very powerful drug. {{U}}?(64) ?{{/U}} can treat many kinds of infections. However, it has some bad effects. Sometimes it causes a skin problem or a light fever. And it can be fatal for people {{U}}?(65) ?{{/U}} are allergic(过敏性的)to it. That is why before you take a penicillin shot, the doctor gives you a test shot first. |
A:produced B:killed C:helped D:spread
It is clear that some chemicals can damage the health of animals and humans. (1) , this is not the only problem that (2) be caused by the careless use of chemicals. Chemicals can also (3) the ecological balance of the environment. If the ecological balance is disturbed, the results can be (4) serious.The (5) of DDT illustrates the problem. DDT, a chemical which kills insects, at first seemed to be a perfect answer (6) many problems. It would control insects that caused dangerous diseases, (7) insects that caused billions of dollars of damage to crops every year. Governments permitted and even (8) the use of DDT. Farmers in many countries (9) to spray it on their crops. The (10) results were good. Damage to crops (11) down, and profits went up. However, the chemical had effects which the scientists didn’t see in (12) . First, it also killed insects which were the (13) enemies of the harmful insects and which were therefore beneficial to farmers. Second, and perhaps worse, DDT did not kill (14) harmful insect. A few insects had natural resistance to the chemical. They (15) and reproduced in large numbers. In a few years there were large numbers of insects which were not (16) by DDT, and there were (17) insects which Could act as natural (18) on these new "super-insects". Finally, it became clear that DDT was not solving the insect problem. In fact, it was making the problem worse. It (19) became necessary to find a second (20) for the effects of the first.
第(16)空应选择()A:effected B:affected C:damaged D:killed
It is clear that some chemicals can damage the health of animals and humans. (1) , this is not the only problem that (2) be caused by the careless use of chemicals. Chemicals can also (3) the ecological balance of the environment. If the ecological balance is disturbed, the results can be (4) serious.The (5) of DDT illustrates the problem. DDT, a chemical which kills insects, at first seemed to be a perfect answer (6) many problems. It would control insects that caused dangerous diseases, (7) insects that caused billions of dollars of damage to crops every year. Governments permitted and even (8) the use of DDT. Farmers in many countries (9) to spray it on their crops. The (10) results were good. Damage to crops (11) down, and profits went up. However, the chemical had effects which the scientists didn’t see in (12) . First, it also killed insects which were the (13) enemies of the harmful insects and which were therefore beneficial to farmers. Second, and perhaps worse, DDT did not kill (14) harmful insect. A few insects had natural resistance to the chemical. They (15) and reproduced in large numbers. In a few years there were large numbers of insects which were not (16) by DDT, and there were (17) insects which Could act as natural (18) on these new "super-insects". Finally, it became clear that DDT was not solving the insect problem. In fact, it was making the problem worse. It (19) became necessary to find a second (20) for the effects of the first.
第(16)空应选择()A:effected B:affected C:damaged D:killed
您可能感兴趣的题目