Mr. Wang is the (only one) of the teachers (in) our university (who) (own) a car.( )
A:only one B:in C:who D:own
Happiness can be described as a positive mood and a pleasant state of mind. According to recent polls (民意测试) , sixty to seventy percent of Americans consider themselves to be moderately happy and one in twenty persons feel very unhappy. Psychologists have been studying the factors that contribute to happiness. It is not predictable nor is a person in an apparently ideal situation necessarily happy. The ideal situation may have little to do with his actual feelings.
A good education and income are usually considered necessary for happiness. Though both may contribute, they are only chief factors if the person is seriously undereducated or actually suffering from lack of physical needs.
The rich are not likely to be happier than the middle-income group or even those with very low incomes. People with college educations are somewhat happier than those who did not graduate from high school, and it is believed that this is mainly because they have more opportunity to control their lives. Yet people with a high income and a college education may be less happy than those with the same income and no college education.
Poor health does not rule out happiness except for the severely disabled or those in pain. Learning to cope with a health problem can contribute to happiness. Those with a good sex life are happier in general, but those who have a loving, affectionate relationship are happier than those who rely on sex alone. Love has a higher correlation with happiness than any other factor.
It should be noted that people quickly get used to what they have, and they are happiest when they feel they are increasing their level no matter where it stands at a given time.
Children whose parents were happily married have happier childhoods yet they are not necessarily happier adults when they grow up.
The best formula for happiness is to be able to develop the ability to tolerate frustration, to have a personal involvement and commitment, and to develop self-confidence and self-esteem.
A:have less opportunity to control their lives B:have more opportunity to control their lives C:are not happier than those who have only an education at high school D:are much happier than those who did not graduate from high school
Euthanasia: a Heatedly Debated Topic "We mustn’’t delay any longer...?swallowing(吞咽) is difficult...and breathing, that’’s also difficult. Those muscles are weakening too...we mustn’’t delay any longer." These were the words of Dutchman(荷兰人) Cees van wendel de Joode asking his doctor to help him die. Affected with a serious disease, van Vendel was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly deteriorating. Van Venders last three months of life before being given a final, lethal injection by his doctor were filmed and first shown on television last year in the Netherlands. The programme has since been bought by 20 countries and each time it is shown, it starts a nationwide debate on the subject. The Netherlands is the only country in Europe which permits euthanasia (安乐死) , although it is not technically legal there. However, doctors who carry out euthanasia under strict guidelines introduced by the Dutch Parliament(议会) two years ago are usually not prosecuted. The guidelines demand that the patient is experiencing extreme suffering, that there is no chance of a cure, and that the patient has made repeated requests for euthanasia. In addition to this, a second doctor must confirm(证实) that these criteria have been met and the death must be reported to the police department. Should doctors be allowed to take the live of others? Dr. Wilfred Van Oijen, Cees van Vendel’’s doctor, explains how he looks at the question: "Well, it’’s not as if I in planning to murder a crowd of people with a machine gun. In that case, killing is the worst thing I can imagine. But that’’s entirely different from my work as a doctor. I care for people and I try to ensure that they don’t suffer too much. That’’s very different thing. " Many people, though, are totally against the practice of euthanasia. Dr. Andrew Ferguson, Chairman of the organization Healthcare opposed to Euthanasia, says that "in the vast majority of euthanasia cases , what the patient is actually asking for is something else. They may want a health professional to open up communication for them with their loved ones or family—there’’s nearly always another question behind the question." Britain also has a strong tradition of hospices—special hospitals which care only for the dying and their special needs. Cicely Saunders, President of the National Hospice Council and a founder member of the hospice movement, argues that euthanasia doesn’’t take into account that there are ways of caring for the dying. She is also concerned that allowing euthanasia would undermine the need for care and consideration of a wide range of people; "It’’s very easy in society now for the elderly, the disabled (伤残的) and the dependent to feel that they are burdens, and therefore that they ought to opt(脱离) out. I think that anything that legally allows the shortening of life does make those people more vulnerable (脆弱的)." Many find this prohibition of an individual’’s right to the paternalistic (家长式的). Although they agree that life is important and should be respected, they feel that the quality of life should not be ignored. Dr. Van Oijen believes that people have the fundamental right to choose for themselves if they want to die: "What those people who oppose euthanasia are telling me is that dying people haven’t the right. And that when people are very ill, we are all afraid of their death. But there are situations where death is a friend. And in those cases, why not?" But "why not?" is a question which might cause strong emotion. The film showing Cees Van Vendel’’s death was both moving and sensitive. His doctor was clearly a family friend; his wife had only her husband’’s interests at heart. Some, however, would argue that it would be dangerous to use this particular example to support the case for euthanasia. Not all patients would receive such a high level of individual care and attention. When the author says "But why not? is a question might cause strong emotion," (the last para. )he may mean______.
A:Cees Van Vendel was a man with much emotion B:Cees Van Vendel’s doctor and wife were both sensitive C:many people oppose the standpoints of those who support the practice of euthanasia strongly D:only those who are full of emotion can say such words.
A:In the study, all the subjects developed SIEs. B:In the study, only the subjects who had more than one SIE suffered the cognitive decline. C:In the study, all the subjects had a high level of TNF. D:In the study, those who had no SIE suffered less cognitive decline than those who ha
A:Those with the lowest level of carotene intake. B:Those with the highest level o carotene intake. C:Those who ate only foods containing carotene. D:Those with the lowest intake of carrots.
Euthanasia: a Heatedly Debated Topic "We mustn’’t delay any longer...?swallowing(吞咽) is difficult...and breathing, that’’s also difficult. Those muscles are weakening too...we mustn’’t delay any longer." These were the words of Dutchman(荷兰人) Cees van wendel de Joode asking his doctor to help him die. Affected with a serious disease, van Vendel was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly deteriorating. Van Venders last three months of life before being given a final, lethal injection by his doctor were filmed and first shown on television last year in the Netherlands. The programme has since been bought by 20 countries and each time it is shown, it starts a nationwide debate on the subject. The Netherlands is the only country in Europe which permits euthanasia (安乐死) , although it is not technically legal there. However, doctors who carry out euthanasia under strict guidelines introduced by the Dutch Parliament(议会) two years ago are usually not prosecuted. The guidelines demand that the patient is experiencing extreme suffering, that there is no chance of a cure, and that the patient has made repeated requests for euthanasia. In addition to this, a second doctor must confirm(证实) that these criteria have been met and the death must be reported to the police department. Should doctors be allowed to take the live of others? Dr. Wilfred Van Oijen, Cees van Vendel’’s doctor, explains how he looks at the question: "Well, it’’s not as if I in planning to murder a crowd of people with a machine gun. In that case, killing is the worst thing I can imagine. But that’’s entirely different from my work as a doctor. I care for people and I try to ensure that they don’t suffer too much. That’’s very different thing. " Many people, though, are totally against the practice of euthanasia. Dr. Andrew Ferguson, Chairman of the organization Healthcare opposed to Euthanasia, says that "in the vast majority of euthanasia cases , what the patient is actually asking for is something else. They may want a health professional to open up communication for them with their loved ones or family—there’’s nearly always another question behind the question." Britain also has a strong tradition of hospices—special hospitals which care only for the dying and their special needs. Cicely Saunders, President of the National Hospice Council and a founder member of the hospice movement, argues that euthanasia doesn’’t take into account that there are ways of caring for the dying. She is also concerned that allowing euthanasia would undermine the need for care and consideration of a wide range of people; "It’’s very easy in society now for the elderly, the disabled (伤残的) and the dependent to feel that they are burdens, and therefore that they ought to opt(脱离) out. I think that anything that legally allows the shortening of life does make those people more vulnerable (脆弱的)." Many find this prohibition of an individual’’s right to the paternalistic (家长式的). Although they agree that life is important and should be respected, they feel that the quality of life should not be ignored. Dr. Van Oijen believes that people have the fundamental right to choose for themselves if they want to die: "What those people who oppose euthanasia are telling me is that dying people haven’t the right. And that when people are very ill, we are all afraid of their death. But there are situations where death is a friend. And in those cases, why not?" But "why not?" is a question which might cause strong emotion. The film showing Cees Van Vendel’’s death was both moving and sensitive. His doctor was clearly a family friend; his wife had only her husband’’s interests at heart. Some, however, would argue that it would be dangerous to use this particular example to support the case for euthanasia. Not all patients would receive such a high level of individual care and attention. When the author says "But why not? is a question might cause strong emotion," (the last para. )he may mean______.
A:Cees Van Vendel was a man with much emotion B:Cees Van Vendel’s doctor and wife were both sensitive C:many people oppose the standpoints of those who support the practice of euthanasia strongly D:only those who are full of emotion can say such words.
Euthanasia: a Heatedly Debated Topic "We mustn’’t delay any longer...?swallowing(吞咽) is difficult...and breathing, that’’s also difficult. Those muscles are weakening too...we mustn’’t delay any longer." These were the words of Dutchman(荷兰人) Cees van wendel de Joode asking his doctor to help him die. Affected with a serious disease, van Vendel was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly deteriorating. Van Venders last three months of life before being given a final, lethal injection by his doctor were filmed and first shown on television last year in the Netherlands. The programme has since been bought by 20 countries and each time it is shown, it starts a nationwide debate on the subject. The Netherlands is the only country in Europe which permits euthanasia (安乐死) , although it is not technically legal there. However, doctors who carry out euthanasia under strict guidelines introduced by the Dutch Parliament(议会) two years ago are usually not prosecuted. The guidelines demand that the patient is experiencing extreme suffering, that there is no chance of a cure, and that the patient has made repeated requests for euthanasia. In addition to this, a second doctor must confirm(证实) that these criteria have been met and the death must be reported to the police department. Should doctors be allowed to take the live of others? Dr. Wilfred Van Oijen, Cees van Vendel’’s doctor, explains how he looks at the question: "Well, it’’s not as if I in planning to murder a crowd of people with a machine gun. In that case, killing is the worst thing I can imagine. But that’’s entirely different from my work as a doctor. I care for people and I try to ensure that they don’t suffer too much. That’’s very different thing. " Many people, though, are totally against the practice of euthanasia. Dr. Andrew Ferguson, Chairman of the organization Healthcare opposed to Euthanasia, says that "in the vast majority of euthanasia cases , what the patient is actually asking for is something else. They may want a health professional to open up communication for them with their loved ones or family—there’’s nearly always another question behind the question." Britain also has a strong tradition of hospices—special hospitals which care only for the dying and their special needs. Cicely Saunders, President of the National Hospice Council and a founder member of the hospice movement, argues that euthanasia doesn’’t take into account that there are ways of caring for the dying. She is also concerned that allowing euthanasia would undermine the need for care and consideration of a wide range of people; "It’’s very easy in society now for the elderly, the disabled (伤残的) and the dependent to feel that they are burdens, and therefore that they ought to opt(脱离) out. I think that anything that legally allows the shortening of life does make those people more vulnerable (脆弱的)." Many find this prohibition of an individual’’s right to the paternalistic (家长式的). Although they agree that life is important and should be respected, they feel that the quality of life should not be ignored. Dr. Van Oijen believes that people have the fundamental right to choose for themselves if they want to die: "What those people who oppose euthanasia are telling me is that dying people haven’t the right. And that when people are very ill, we are all afraid of their death. But there are situations where death is a friend. And in those cases, why not?" But "why not?" is a question which might cause strong emotion. The film showing Cees Van Vendel’’s death was both moving and sensitive. His doctor was clearly a family friend; his wife had only her husband’’s interests at heart. Some, however, would argue that it would be dangerous to use this particular example to support the case for euthanasia. Not all patients would receive such a high level of individual care and attention. When the author says "But why not? is a question might cause strong emotion," (the last para. )he may mean______.
A:Cees Van Vendel was a man with much emotion B:Cees Van Vendel’s doctor and wife were both sensitive C:many people oppose the standpoints of those who support the practice of euthanasia strongly D:only those who are full of emotion can say such words.