OECD提出的信息产业包括( )部分。

A:信息科技部门 B:信息通信技术部门 C:信息经济部门 D:信息内容部门 E:信息规划部门

OECD提出的信息产业包括（）部分。

A:信息实施部门 B:信息通信技术部门 C:信息经济部门 D:信息内容部门 E:信息规划部门

2013年，世界各国经济走势出现分化，美国经济稳步复苏、日本经济在政策刺激下向好转变；欧元区经济总体上依旧疲软，新兴经济体增速有所回落.在此背景下，全球油品需求较平缓，供给相对宽松，国际油价呈现震荡下行走势。
国际能源署数据显示，2013年，全球石油供应量为9165万桶/日，同比增长70万桶/日左右，远不及2012年的220万桶/日的增量。其中，欧佩克石油供应量为3688万桶/日，比2012年下降70万桶/日左右；受益于美国原油产量的大幅提高，2013年非欧佩克石油供应量为5477万桶/日，比2012年增长142万桶/日，远高于2012年的50万桶/日的增量。其中，北美地区石油产量增至1724万桶/日，同比增长138万桶/日，仅美国就增加115万桶/日，加拿大增加26万桶/日。由于利比亚、尼日利亚、伊朗等国__势不稳定，这些国家石油产量大幅下降，而沙特、科威特等国石油产量变化不大，2013年欧佩克原油产量结束上升势头，由2012年的3130万桶/日降至3047万桶/日
2013年，世界经济缓慢复苏，拉动世界石油需求增长平稳。国际能源署统计，2013年世界石油需求增长120万桶/日。发达国家复苏势头较好，OECD国家石油需求降幅缩小。2013年OECD国家石油需求同比下降5万桶/日，而2012年需求则下降52万桶/日。其中，2013年日本石油需求下降18万桶/日；欧洲五国（德国、法国、意大利、西班牙和英国）需求下降9万桶/日；美国石油需求则增长21万桶/日，结束了连续数年需求下滑的趋势。虽然新兴经济体国家经济增长普遍放缓，但非OECD国家石油需求增长仍较强劲，同比增长125万桶/日，与上年基本相当。其中亚太、中东、拉美石油需求分别增长63万桶/日、15万桶/日和21万桶/日，合计占2013年世界石油需求增长量的79%。

A:2013年，全球石油供应量同比增量低于2012年 B:2013年，世界石油需求同比增量低于2012年 C:2013年，OECD国家石油需求比2011年下降57万桶/日 D:2013年，非OECD国家石油需求同比增长125万桶/日

OECD

简述加入OECD具备的先决条件。

OECD制定了（）。

A:国际种子检验规程 B:ISO9000系列标准 C:国际植物新品种保护公约 D:种子认证方案

America acted quickly and decisively to the Great Recession, while Europeans seem paralyzed by the distant past. The swift and decisive U.S. response to the financial crisis and deep recession should be a model for other large developed economies. Yet Europe, which is now facing sovereign debt and banking problems and a slowdown in growth, seems reluctant to follow America’s lead.
The United States emerged from its 2008 economic cataclysm with relative speed because policymakers learned from history. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke had famously internalized the charge that the central bank had contributed to the Great Depression. The frenzied response of the Bernanke Fed—guaranteeing all sorts of assets and markets, purchasing mortgage-backed securities, adopting a zero-interest rate policy, and expanding its balance shed to $ 2.3 trillion can be seen as signs of overcompensation. And from Japan’s experience in the 1990s, the Fed learned the need for speed.
While some critics have charged the U.S. fiscal stimulus was too small, the data suggest that the stimulus package has been a significant contributor to job retention and growth. Increased federal spending was needed in part to combat the declines in government spending by states. In the United States, the federal government helped prop up the states with injections of cash. In Europe, which lacks a powerful overarching federal government with the ability to tax and spend, fiscal policy is all bitter medicine and no spoonfuls of sugar. From the United Kingdom to the Czech Republic, and all points in between, governments are cutting spending and raising taxes. But these contractionary policies will retard economic growth, which will in turn lead to more problems for the banks.
The European Central Bank and European governments are embracing fiscal austerity and comparative monetary tightness in these extraordinary times because they remain paralyzed by a terrible fear of inflation. The Federal Reserve has the dual mandate of controlling inflation and promoting employment. The ECB, by contrast, is concerned primarily with inflation. Never mind that the OECD data on inflation shows it is under control. The Europeans remain freaked out by the prospect of inflation at some point in the future. In its outlook, the OECD writes. "On inflation, the issue is not whether it is a risk today—it is not but whether it will be a risk in two years’ time. "
In the United States, the desire to avoid mistakes made in the distant and recent past has led to perhaps excessively vigorous fiscal and monetary policies. For Europeans, the desire to avoid mistakes made in the distant past has led to an excess of caution. When they look to history for guidance, European policymakers aren’t looking at Washington in 2009, or Japan in the 1990s, or the United States in the 1930s. Rather, they look to Europe in the 1920s, a period when hyperinflation ravaged economies, disrupted the social order, destroyed social democracies, and led to the rise of Nazism.
Europe’s concern over inflation

A:has annoyed its American partner. B:is supported by OECD statistics. C:makes it execute vigorous polices. D:bears no substance at all.

America acted quickly and decisively to the Great Recession, while Europeans seem paralyzed by the distant past. The swift and decisive U.S. response to the financial crisis and deep recession should be a model for other large developed economies. Yet Europe, which is now facing sovereign debt and banking problems and a slowdown in growth, seems reluctant to follow America’s lead.
The United States emerged from its 2008 economic cataclysm with relative speed because policymakers learned from history. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke had famously internalized the charge that the central bank had contributed to the Great Depression. The frenzied response of the Bernanke Fed—guaranteeing all sorts of assets and markets, purchasing mortgage-backed securities, adopting a zero-interest rate policy, and expanding its balance shed to $ 2.3 trillion can be seen as signs of overcompensation. And from Japan’s experience in the 1990s, the Fed learned the need for speed.
While some critics have charged the U.S. fiscal stimulus was too small, the data suggest that the stimulus package has been a significant contributor to job retention and growth. Increased federal spending was needed in part to combat the declines in government spending by states. In the United States, the federal government helped prop up the states with injections of cash. In Europe, which lacks a powerful overarching federal government with the ability to tax and spend, fiscal policy is all bitter medicine and no spoonfuls of sugar. From the United Kingdom to the Czech Republic, and all points in between, governments are cutting spending and raising taxes. But these contractionary policies will retard economic growth, which will in turn lead to more problems for the banks.
The European Central Bank and European governments are embracing fiscal austerity and comparative monetary tightness in these extraordinary times because they remain paralyzed by a terrible fear of inflation. The Federal Reserve has the dual mandate of controlling inflation and promoting employment. The ECB, by contrast, is concerned primarily with inflation. Never mind that the OECD data on inflation shows it is under control. The Europeans remain freaked out by the prospect of inflation at some point in the future. In its outlook, the OECD writes. "On inflation, the issue is not whether it is a risk today—it is not but whether it will be a risk in two years’ time. "
In the United States, the desire to avoid mistakes made in the distant and recent past has led to perhaps excessively vigorous fiscal and monetary policies. For Europeans, the desire to avoid mistakes made in the distant past has led to an excess of caution. When they look to history for guidance, European policymakers aren’t looking at Washington in 2009, or Japan in the 1990s, or the United States in the 1930s. Rather, they look to Europe in the 1920s, a period when hyperinflation ravaged economies, disrupted the social order, destroyed social democracies, and led to the rise of Nazism.
Europe’s concern over inflation

A:has annoyed its American partner. B:is supported by OECD statistics. C:makes it execute vigorous polices. D:bears no substance at all.