EDA技术
EDA技术
SOX is an alternative（1）for XML.It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a（2）.editor.It is then easily transformed into proper XML.SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal oftime with raw XML.For many ofus,thepopular XML（3）have not reached a point where their tree views,tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying（4）languagE.This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view,albeit enhanced,for editing other languages such as Java）SOX uses（5）to represent the structure of an XML document,which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices.The result is surprisingly clear.
空白（2）处应选择（）A:graphic B:program C:command D:text
SOX is an alternative（1）for XML. It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a（2）editor. It is then easily transformed into proper XML. SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal of time with raw XML. For many of us, the popular XML（3）have not reached a point where their tree views, tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying（4）language. This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view, albeit enhanced, for editing other languages such as Java. SOX uses（5）to represent the structure ofan XML document, which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices. The result is surprisingly clear.
空白（2）处应选择（）A:graphic B:program C:command D:text
Part A
Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer
the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on
ANSWER SHEET 1.
Text 1
| The newspaper must provide for the
reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted (不歪曲的), objectively selected facts.
But in the days of complex news it must provide more; it must supply
interpretation, the meaning of the facts. This is the most important assignment
confronting American journalism—to make clear to the reader the problems of the
day, to make international news as understandable as community news, to
recognize that the there is no longer any such thing as "local" news, bemuse any
event in the international area has a local reaction in manpower draft, in
economic strain, in terms, indeed, of our very Way of life. There is in journalism a widespread view that when you embark on interpretation, you are entering dangerous waters, the swirling tides of opinion. This is nonsense. The opponents of interpretation insist that the writer and the editor shall confine himself to the "facts". This insistence raises two questions: What are the facts And: Are the bare facts enough As to the first query. Consider how a so-called "factual" story comes about. The reporter collects, say, fifty facts; out of these fifty, his space allotment being necessarily restricted, he selects the ten which he considers most important. This is Judgment Number One. Then he or his editor decides which of these ten facts shall constitute the lead of the piece. (This is an important decision bemuse many readers do not proceed beyond the first paragraph.) This is Judgments Number Two. Then the night editor determines whether the article shall be presented on page one, where it has larger impact, or on page twenty-four, where it has little, Judgment Number Three. Thus, in the presentation of a so-called "factual" or "objective" story, at least three judgments are involved. And they are judgments not at all unlike those involved in interpretation, in which reporter and editor, calling upon their research resources, their general background, and their "news neutralism" arrive at a conclusion as to the significance of the news. The two areas of judgment, presentation of the news and its interpretation, are both objective rather than subjective processes—as objective, that is, as any human being can be. (Note in passing: even though complete objectivity can never be achieved, nevertheless the ideal must always be the beacon on the murky news channels.) if an editor is intent on slanting the news. he can do it in other ways and more effectively than by interpretation. He can do it by the selection of those facts that prop up(支持)his particular plea. Or he can do it by the play when he gives a story promoting it to page one or demoting it to page thirty. |
A:His editor is prejudiced. B:The subject is not important. C:Space is limited. D:Readers would prefer short stones.
Part A
Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer
the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on
ANSWER SHEET 1.
Text 1
| The newspaper must provide for the
reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted (不歪曲的), objectively selected facts.
But in the days of complex news it must provide more; it must supply
interpretation, the meaning of the facts. This is the most important assignment
confronting American journalism—to make clear to the reader the problems of the
day, to make international news as understandable as community news, to
recognize that the there is no longer any such thing as "local" news, bemuse any
event in the international area has a local reaction in manpower draft, in
economic strain, in terms, indeed, of our very Way of life. There is in journalism a widespread view that when you embark on interpretation, you are entering dangerous waters, the swirling tides of opinion. This is nonsense. The opponents of interpretation insist that the writer and the editor shall confine himself to the "facts". This insistence raises two questions: What are the facts And: Are the bare facts enough As to the first query. Consider how a so-called "factual" story comes about. The reporter collects, say, fifty facts; out of these fifty, his space allotment being necessarily restricted, he selects the ten which he considers most important. This is Judgment Number One. Then he or his editor decides which of these ten facts shall constitute the lead of the piece. (This is an important decision bemuse many readers do not proceed beyond the first paragraph.) This is Judgments Number Two. Then the night editor determines whether the article shall be presented on page one, where it has larger impact, or on page twenty-four, where it has little, Judgment Number Three. Thus, in the presentation of a so-called "factual" or "objective" story, at least three judgments are involved. And they are judgments not at all unlike those involved in interpretation, in which reporter and editor, calling upon their research resources, their general background, and their "news neutralism" arrive at a conclusion as to the significance of the news. The two areas of judgment, presentation of the news and its interpretation, are both objective rather than subjective processes—as objective, that is, as any human being can be. (Note in passing: even though complete objectivity can never be achieved, nevertheless the ideal must always be the beacon on the murky news channels.) if an editor is intent on slanting the news. he can do it in other ways and more effectively than by interpretation. He can do it by the selection of those facts that prop up(支持)his particular plea. Or he can do it by the play when he gives a story promoting it to page one or demoting it to page thirty. |
A:It will influence the reader to continue. B:It will be the best way to write. C:Some readers do not read beyond the first paragraph. D:It will gratify the editor.
SOX is an alternative (66) for XML. It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a (67) editor. It is then easily transformed into proper XML. SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal of time with raw XML. For many of us, the popular XML (68) have not reached a point where their tree views, tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying (69) language. This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view, albeit enhanced, for editing other languages such as Java. SOX uses (70) to represent the structure of an XML document, which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices. The result is surprisingly clear.
67（）A:command B:program C:graphic D:text
SOX is an alternative (71) for XML. It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a (72) editor. It is then easily transformed into proper XML. SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal of time with raw XML. For many of us, the popular XML (73) have not reached a point where their tree views, tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying (74) language. This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view, albeit enhanced, for editing other languages such as Java. SOX uses (75) to represent the structure of an XML document, which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices. The result is surprisingly clear.
（72）处填（）。A:command B:program C:graphic D:text
SOX is an alternative (156) for XML. It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a (157) editor. It is then easily transformed into proper XML. SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal of time with raw XML. For many of us, the popular XML (158) have not reached a point where their tree views, tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying (159) language. This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view, albeit enhanced, for editing other languages such as Java. SOX uses (160) to represent the structure of an XML document, which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices. The result is surprisingly clear.
（157）是（）A:graphic B:program C:command D:text
SOX is an alternative (156) for XML. It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a (157) editor. It is then easily transformed into proper XML. SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal of time with raw XML. For many of us, the popular XML (158) have not reached a point where their tree views, tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying (159) language. This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view, albeit enhanced, for editing other languages such as Java. SOX uses (160) to represent the structure of an XML document, which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices. The result is surprisingly clear.
A:graphic B:program C:command D:text
SOX is an alternative（）for XML. It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a（）editor. It is then easily transformed into proper XML. SOX was created because developers can spend a great deal of time with raw XML. For many of us, the popular XML（）have not reached a point where their tree views, tables and forms can completely substitute for the underlying（）language. This is not surprising when one considers that developers still use a text view, albeit enhanced, for editing other languages such as Java. SOX uses（）to represent the structure of an XML document, which eliminates the need for closing tags and a number of quoting devices. The result is surprisingly clear.
It is useful for reading and creating XML content in a（）editor.A:graphic B:program C:command D:text
您可能感兴趣的题目
